The Trust that is put in City and country
Additional Information
Tim Sargeant now has a total of 37, its gone up, Directorships registered against his name. Executive profiles – My name is David Jones, together with my wife I had the misfortune of entering into a contract with Tim Sargeant which changed the course of our lives and took us all the way to our banging on the door of the Supreme Court of Appeal only to be turned away. This is a good place to show off who’s occupying the corner offices. Write a nice bio about each executive that includes what they do, how long they’ve been at it, and what got them to where they are.
Learn More
This is a content pr My name is David Jones, together with my wife I had the misfortune of entering into a contract with Tim Sargeant which changed the course of our lives and took us all the way to our banging on the door of the Supreme Court of Appeal only to be turned away. eview space you can use to get your audience interested in what you have to say so they can’t wait to learn and read more. Pull out the most interesting detail that appears on the page and write it here.
About Us
Come on.... was it really like that, judging by that last statement it certainly wasn't our experience?
That statement, in reality, is a half truth.... it would appear that Sarbir may well have sported a less than favourable history given that we had been advised by our legal team to have Tim Sargeant's name added to the contract..... not that it did us any good.
During the years 2002/2003 when Sarbir evolved into City & Country the company specialised in Barn Conversions more so than general building which at that time was just coming into it's own. C&C were certainly not involved in anything resembling the works that are undertaken today, we dealt with what appeared to be little more than a back street builder who turned their hands to converting Barns....
So the question has to be why would they renege on the contract with ourselves to convert the 2 barns concerned when they had obtained the planning consent required to enact the purchase of our property and put the deal in motion. The contract was specifically built around the planning consent being obtained for 2 residential dwellings which enacted the purchase of our property and set the wheels in motion for the Overage payment to ourselves which begs the question why didn't they convert the barns, why did they sell them on... what was the motive if it wasn't all part of an underhand plan to enable City & Country to be able to off load a pair of redundant barns that having already been turned down on planning for conversion had been described as having absolutely "No Commercial Value"..... they had the expertise to carry out the works and they had the contacts required to undertake the works.... so what happened in between.
Tim Sargeant claimed that he required planning approval for more than 2 barns, but that is not what he had agreed in the contract, he was reneging on the contract, but that didn't stop him from completing the purchase and buying our party wall building thereby taking our business from us, why would he do that if he had got what he sought planning consent for which was exactly what he got.... planning for 2 dwellings.
Why didn't he simply seek agreement to allow him to walk away, he got what he asked for.... planning consent for 2 dwellings?
Both of the barns had been sold to private individuals who had never undertaken such works..... they were to all intents and purposes novices having never undertaken such works and yet both of the Barn Conversions were successful and everyone earned good money.
So why would C&C, a specialist in Barn conversions, walk away from a pair of very lucrative simple conversion and renege on the contract with ourselves, complete novices made it work, they were successful..... why would they do that other than for it to have enabled the company to obtain a means of offloading a pair of barns with no commercial value by purchasing our party wall building.
.jpg/:/cr=t:14.79%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:70.42%25/rs=w:600,h:300,cg:true)
Under Construction.... so you will have to wait
What's something exciting your business offers? Say it here.
Why would
this is also on it's way
Tim Sargeant claimed C&C owned the Restrictive Covenant....
Tim Sargeant had provided us with the pricing formula that C&C used to determine the value of the restrictive Covenant that burdened our party wall building and precluded us from keeping agricultural livestock in that building. This led to demands for us to pay him £200k after he claimed we failed to argue the
After
About Us
Generate excitement
What's something exciting your business offers? Say it here.
Grab interest
Say something interesting about your business here.
Close the deal
Give customers a reason to do business with you.